Article

Last weekend, one of the more out of the ordinary meetings in recent memory took place out in Berkeley where some 30 people gathered to begin planning for the world's transition from the industrial age to whatever is to come.

They were a diverse group, coming from all over North America and representing an array of disciplines. Most had grey hair and among them held many advanced degrees and had written stacks of books and papers.

There was, however, a common thread that held them together. Not a person in the room needed to be convinced that the world is entering upon a great paradigm shift that will sweep away much of industrial civilization, thoughts of economic growth, and the lifestyles that have grown up in the age of ubiquitous fossil fuels.

To the agreement of those present, speakers quickly outlined the problem. In a nutshell, the world is dangerously close to "peak everything" - oil, coal, natural gas, water, minerals, soil, phosphorous, fish, and perhaps the most important of all, the capacity of the atmosphere to absorb more carbon without triggering off life-destroying phenomena. Problem two is the financial collapse from efforts by too many governments to spend their way out of recession. The final phenomenon that will force changes, is that there is no sign that mankind is about to make the efforts required to stop spewing carbon into the already saturated atmosphere. Without at least some moderation, it is likely that the atmosphere eventually will have its revenge by raising global temperatures so much that there will be no higher forms of life left.

Absent from the meeting was any representation from our political leadership who are currently busy:1) denying there is a problem; 2) trying to spend our way out of the recession; or 3) simply overcome by the pace of events and do not want to rock the boat by speaking publically on such matters before the next election.

The meeting's organizer, a seven-year old think-tank called the Post Carbon Institute, has no problem with this, for they know that leaders everywhere will soon enough grasp the message they don't want to hear. Oil will run short, the financial system will collapse, or the atmosphere will do such terrible things to us, that every last person on earth will understand - our lifestyles are not sustainable and we will soon transition to some other manner of life or die off like so many species before us.

The underlying assumption of all this is that in a few decades mankind is going to be left with dwindling supplies of carbon-based fuels, land that will no longer grow sufficient food for the 7+ billion of us, oceans that will not supply fish, dwindling water supply, and an atmosphere that is becoming increasing hostile to live in.

What sets the Post Carbon Institute's efforts apart is that, unlike most, they recognize the seriousness and inevitability of the problem and are starting the search for solutions concerning what mankind can do get through a very bad era-to-come with some semblance of humanity and its cultures still intact.
This, of course, may be much more difficult than most realize for discussions are underway about how many people the earth can sustain without fossil fuels and abundant fresh water, and with ravished soil and dead oceans. There are currently about 6.9 billion of us (growing at nearly 80 million a year) of which 50 percent live in cities where not much food is being grown. Some population experts think the earth's "people carrying capacity" in the conditions we are about to encounter will be on the order of 1 or 2 billion. Some pessimists think we should be talking a few hundred million. If this should prove the case, not many of us are going to have descendents a few centuries from now.

As they already have a pretty good idea as to what is about to happen, the Post Carbon folks are starting to look at what it will take to keep some semblance of humanity functioning -- hence the emphasis on transition. Obviously some things than are now taken completely for granted by many such as food, water, shelter, sanitation, medicine, public health will have to change radically.

When cheap artificial fertilizers disappear the amount of food available is going to drop precipitously as our agricultural land has become dependent on them. The end of cheap liquid fuel for transportation will make urban and suburban life increasingly difficult. While some lucky few can migrate closer to what will be left of food supplies, many of the 4 billion or so urban dwellers are going to be caught in that "carrying capacity" problem.

So what can a handful of people sitting around a room in California do about all this? The short answer is to begin assembling enough information so that the rest of us can understand what is happening -- when we come to grasp the magnitude of the problem -- and then to assemble information on how we might transition to and live in a post-carbon world. Many of the people that assembled in California know something about agriculture, ecology, biodiversity - the skills humanity will need to survive after a 200 year binge on fossil fuels.

The next step will be sensitizing people to the problem. Currently this is a difficult task as fossil fuels, water, and food are still relatively cheap and abundant. While those who have recently lost their jobs and cannot find work may be starting to realize there is a deeper problem, most still hope that the politicians can put things back the way they were. Somewhere in the future, and it may be months, years, or perhaps decades, nearly all of us will realize that life as we have known it is over forever.

Originally published January 27, 2010 at Falls Church News-Press

Like this article?

Keep the information flowing: Donate to Post Carbon Institute
Stay connected: Receive our monthly e-newsletter


Add Your Comment

(not published)

Reader Comments

12 comments

islands of sustainability

From: Mike Murphy, Feb 1, 10 04:56 PM

I think we need to create farm-based islands of sustainability, hundreds, thousands of them, that can demonstrate how and teach others to do likewise. On farms and in smaller cities. The first step is to grow food sustainably. The second step is to create communities that steward that sustainable farming, and also to create sustainable communities.
Models are The Farm in TN; and Sirius Community in MA; and others. Permaculturists like Bill Mollison and Albert Bates are our teachers. Cuba is a good national example, yet still learning.

Thank you

From: Jed Diamond, Jan 31, 10 03:24 PM

As a community activist and author working to ready our little part of the world, Willits, California, to the changes we are facing, I want to thank you all for your continuing efforts to find and tell the truth and help us all become better prepared to rise to the occasion in the best possible way.

what we're going to do next

From: Shodo Spring, Jan 30, 10 04:43 PM

I know you at Post Carbon know about the Transition movement, I just have to mention it whenever the topic comes up. I also just learned about a movement called "common security clubs" for people facing personal economic crash - which leads to action from a different origin, but to the same place.

response

From: Stephen Saffold, Jan 30, 10 04:35 PM

after years of heading up a local post oil group inertia just ovewhelmed everyone (exept me) seems the subject is too large to comprehend let alone change - even if one changes his/her lifestyle the overwhelming sense is the lifeboat we all cling to(society) will come falling down on us from it's own weight - continuing to fight the good fight- hoping for the best

undecided americans

From: undecided american , Jan 30, 10 08:37 AM

i own a hydro electric power production company through the private equity group I am the president of, and have recently decided I am not a republican after years of identifying my self as one because of there claims to know the future of how things will end up with for instance climate changes being quietly laughed at and that their thoughts are the only possible outcome, which is mindless blind faith.

I am looking to build and buy more clean energy companies as I believe the world is changing. My problem here is why this article is so charged with left wing political undertones, and why has this issue become so extreme in its assumptions? There are many predictions here that are proposed as inevitable facts. That kind of extremism is very unattractive as an outsider looking in since history has proven that predictions almost never seem to be right on. Even if I agree that the direction things are pointing the way your article insists it is hard to believe anything you claim with such extreme certainty claimed by your material. Because of human ingenuity any likelihood of multiple scenarios may happen, we may switch from gasoline to liquid ammonia or fractional hydrogen or we may create enhanced oil recovery technology that unlocks another 50% of all global oil reservoirs (where primary, secondary and tertiary recovery have typically only recover 30% total) and cars become manufactured with a carbon sequestration device. And while I agree the later is less likely it would just as easily placate the masses and life as we know it would not come to a grinding halt.

This is not meant as an insult to your work but I am interested in your responses and ideas on how to reach out to the undecided masses who might not share your political views.
I will end by thanking you for having the guts to get people together and try to make some progress on something you feel strongly about. please send responses to: carbonquestions@gmail.com

Re: diversity

From: Asher Miller, Jan 30, 10 07:57 AM

Jerry, your questions about diversity are spot on. It's an issue we've wrestled with and, frankly, did not succeed in answering as well as we'd like, though not for lack of trying. The reasons are obvious.

If you have concrete suggestions, I'd love to hear them.

Raising Consciousness

From: Robert Gahtan, Jan 29, 10 08:08 PM

This is a time to bring out of the old dustbin, consciousness raising and teach-ins. You cannot expect to mobilize people into action when they are unclear as to what is happening, why it's happening and what can be done about it. Keep up the good work

...

From: Tod Brilliant, Jan 29, 10 07:44 PM

Mary - Great to have your voice in here and look forward to future dialogue.

Mark - Consider the real costs of 'free energy'. You'll soon see, if you're able to beyond the stench and smoke of industrial sprawl and environmental ruin (both the result of unrestrained excavation of natural resources), that one must be careful what one wishes for. As for breaking the known laws of physics, you have to understand the continued skepticism you'll face. The proof is in the pudding. And it seems we won't have to wait long.

Fausto - I think we both think we know the answers to your questions. Let's hope we're both wrong.

Diverse?

From: Jerry Silberman, Jan 29, 10 07:14 PM

How many women? How many not white?
How many under 30? How many not North Americans and not native English speakers?
Diversity does not reside in the academic variations and minute differences in views among middle and upper middle class white men who agree on peak oil, and such a group cannot plan for or lead a transition.

The whole problem

From: Merry Teesdale, Jan 29, 10 06:29 PM

The entirely of the problem is too emotional a subject for most people to bear.. I think this is why more of us don't prepare and move forward. For example, the subject of various ways to stabilize the population, (my favorite to brainstorm about), is almost impossible to talk with people about because the mere mention of it pops them into an emotional state where they have to deal with personal stuff instead of think objectively.
'Presentation is everything' it has been said.
We would do well to present the various consequences of shortages and overpopulation to people in a visual form, using pictures or animation with no words or music or otherways of playing on people's emotions like the environmentalists sometimes do. Just the facts, Ma'am. We must keep the subject in the objective realm. Using pictures, a person can absorb and understand the concept in a wordless way.
I had a great poster I got in a Forest Service office once that showed several energy streams currently in play, it showed the embodied energy in our lumber and paper. It showed the embodied energy in our food. It showed the enormous waste ending up in the dump. A picture is worth a thousand words.

That's all for now. Thanks for enabling me to write you. I've been admiring your work for a few years now and am glad to be able to give some input. I'm a positive idea person who loves nothing better than to brainstorm and receive inspiration. Feel free to contact me anytime.

I so admire your work. You are all heroes in my book.

Sincerely,

Merry Teesdale
Owl Farm,
Bellingham, Washington

Revolutionary energy breakthroughs are happening!

From: Mark Goldes, Jan 29, 10 03:54 PM

One is fractional Hydrogen. Although scientists, with rare exceptions, do not believe it is possible, BlackLight Power plans to demonstrate 50-75 kW prototypes this year and megawatt systems by 2012. PacifiCorp, Conectiv and four small utilities have agreed to purchase more than 8,000 megawatts of electricity.

Two laboratories have performed experiments that validate the excess heat, which has no conventional explanation. The details have been published by Rowan University. Other labs are sure to follow.

Our own work with fractional Hydrogen is focused on hybrid engines. While we disagree with BlackLight's theory, we both see one barrel of water replacing 200 barrels of oil. It seems a hybrid car might travel 1,000 miles on a gallon of ordinary water.

Better yet, when parked appropriately, such cars and trucks will be able to sell power to the local utility. They might also power homes and businesses. No wires required. It is conceivable the vehicles will pay for themselves as a result.

See: http://www.aesopinstitute.org to learn more about "impossible" technologies that can sharply reduce the need for fossil fuels.

Once well proven, we intend to accelerate development to a 24/7 program.

Imagine the impact on the problems you so ably examine.

a lost chance

From: Fausto Lombardi, Jan 29, 10 03:17 PM

I was hoping that the recent recession would have taught us a lesson and some (very few) enlightened politicians would have led Western people to a totally different lifestyle. Unfortunately this is not happening and everybody is just waiting to go back to the happy fossil fuel burning of the past... Are we ever gonna change? Is it really impossible for us to understand that the party is over? Let's wake up, befor the American dream turns into a nightmare!